Monday Musings: Who Apple Should Buy.

By Author: Harvey Briggs, Date: May 08, 2017

Yesterday, Autoblog reported on Citigroup’s recommendation that Apple should spend some of its huge stockpile of cash to buy Tesla. While that’s an interesting notion, and it does give Tesla something it needs – cash – it wouldn’t get Tesla where they need to be. Because in addition to cash Tesla needs several other things. Among those are:

1. Manufacturing knowledge and expertise
2. Production capacity
3. A diverse line of products serving multiple demographics
4. Marketing sophistication

Given that list of needs, Apple doesn’t bring much to the party except for sophisticated marketing. So if Apple is going to spend $51 billion on Tesla, it should spend a few billion more and add the first three needs on the list.

Where can they get that you ask? Three letters…


By buying FCA and Tesla then merging the two companies, Apple would create one complete car company from two that have huge complementary holes. We’ve covered what Tesla needs. But what does FCA need? In addition to cash (something both companies have in common) FCA is way behind in autonomous technologies and electrification. Tesla immediately brings them near the front of the pack in those two areas. In addition, FCA is a collection of iconic brands that while powerful, feel old and dated: Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep, Ram, Fiat, and Alfa Romeo. None of those brands are innovative. Tesla is perceived as the most innovative auto company in the world today. That’s why their valuation is greater than GM. It’s not on Tesla’s physical assets, but their potential. And that’s all wrapped up in the company’s innovative mindset.

It may be a crazy idea. It might not work. But FCA has been looking for a buyer/partner for the past two years. Combining them with an existing traditional car company doesn’t make a lot of sense. Other than scale for purchasing and manufacturing efficiency, and the profitability of Jeep and Ram products, FCA doesn’t really have much to offer GM, VW, Nissan, BMW, or Honda. And they’ve already had a failed marriage with Mercedes-Benz.

FCA is battling for its survival. Tesla needs to put cars in the hands of the nearly half-million people who’ve plunked $1,000 down for a Model 3. Neither of them can achieve either goal alone.

Together they have a fighting chance.

Harvey Briggs

Harvey Briggs is the Founder, Editor, and Publisher of Rides & Drives. He has also written for Car and Driver, Winding Road, and the luxury lifestyle blog, His passions run from fast cars, small planes, boats and motorcycles to music, travel, and sports. When he's not on the road testing the latest cars, he been known to turn up on stage playing rock and blues guitar at clubs around his hometown of Madison, Wisconsin. Follow Harvey's adventures on Instagram and Twitter @harvey_drives and find him on Facebook. Though keeping up could be a problem. As Harvey says, "If I don't slow down, time can't catch me."

With Aviator, Lincoln and Revel Take Sound to Another Dimension

With Aviator, Lincoln and Revel Take Sound to Another Dimension

Rides & Drives | Harvey Briggs | Apr 04, 2019
Around here, we call it “Throttle Therapy”

Around here, we call it “Throttle Therapy”

Rides & Drives | Harvey Briggs | Jan 22, 2019
New Car Friday: Mercedes-Benz S Class Delivers More Power and Class

New Car Friday: Mercedes-Benz S Class Delivers More Power and Class

Rides & Drives | Carolyn Briggs | Apr 21, 2017